Britney Spears Sculpture From the Back
Thursday, April 06, 2006 • (59) Comments • Tags: Art ,Britney Spears ,Celebrity
The Britney Spears Monument to Pro-Life from the back.


Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:04 PM

The front of the sculpture was pretty good considering what it is sculpted of but I think the back just killed it or me.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:05 PM

wtf….wow….ouch….hmmmm…(squirming)

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:15 PM

Eeeeeew.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:16 PM

shock
my whole concept of art has been killed today. blank stare
period

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:17 PM

My whole concept of having children has changed.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:31 PM

Come on now. Who the hell gives birth like that anyway?

And on a freakin animal rug?


Oh and of course he had to pick Britney Spears as the model.

Posted by AgentHollywood  on  04/06  at  04:32 PM

WTF It was bad enough when they said it was supposed to be britney, but now look at the back…WOW!

At least have the statue not muscular

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:47 PM

Like I really really wanted to see Brit’s coochie.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:48 PM

like I said - it looks like a cow birthing—that sculpture is not flattering.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:51 PM

Whoop….! I agree with you…! Who said we wanted a visual of SP comin’ outta her puss?!? Eww Eww Eww! The artist said he was inspired by her. I mean, he couldn’t do a sculpture of his wife?

And what does Brit think about this? I mean, showing her stretch out p*ssy to the world…come on now! Just NASTY! And it doesn’t look like her AT ALL…(to me)!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  04:53 PM

***stretched***oops.

Posted by CelebGossipWhore  on  04/06  at  04:56 PM

not to mention she had a c section.


does this make anyone else wanna puke as much as I do?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  05:04 PM

Now I’m too scared to sleep tonite.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  05:05 PM

Karli You got the words right outta my mouth GAG!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  05:10 PM

OMGIWTF! THAT DOES LOOK LIKE A COW GIVING BIRTH OH WIT BRIT IS A F***IN COW!!!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  05:36 PM

Being a mother myself, I can honestly say that this is proof positive that only a man could have such deluded notions as to what childbirth really is.  This has turned something incredible to something sexual…and anti-choicers hail this as art. 

Thank GOD I’m not a fecking conservative.

And thank GODDESS I’m not a Britney Spears fan.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  05:58 PM

I know childbirth is supposed to be a beautiful thing, but ew.

Posted by CoLoStOmY bAg  on  04/06  at  05:59 PM

That is grossest thing I’ve seen in a while….

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  06:40 PM

it is kinda gross, but that is what childbirth is.  It is what it is…  That being said, that is why while i gave birth I refused it to be video taped or my cooch to be seen by hubby as I gave birth.  But kidos, this is how it really looks.  (and yes people do give birth in that position if not medicated).

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/06  at  06:46 PM

It is simply a bad piece of art.
I mean, I’m sure somebody would enjoy it and I would be interested to see some of this guys other works.
I mean was he well known in his local art community? His regional art community? Or is using Britney a good way of getting some press for what I think doesn’t do a damn thing for the pro-life movement.

It may have worked better as a painting….