Cindy Crawford is Far From Super
Sunday, May 07, 2006 • (22) Comments • Tags: Candids ,Celebrity ,Cindy Crawford ,Fashion ,Models
Cindy Crawford leaves Nobu restaurant yesterday (05/06/06) looking less than fabulous.



See also:

Cindy Crawford Pumps & Picks
Cindy Crawford Back in 1988

Posted by AgentHollywood  on  05/07  at  04:49 PM

Holy shit! this must be a real bad shot. I look at her now and think, why was she the hottest thing back in the day. Maybe it’s because i was way younger and thought that was hot but now, she’s like the lady next door.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  04:52 PM

She is still pretty. The camera just caught her off guard. She looks like just a normal person- not bad, but her eyebrows are really high.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  04:56 PM

OMG!  She looks like a tranny. The hair is too dark…she looks like she could be Hatcher’s sister in these pics, and that’s not a GOOD thing.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  05:19 PM

I was JUST thinking she looks like Teri Hatcher!  They must have the same surgeon..

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  06:18 PM

she is aging is all

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  07:22 PM

First they aren’t good pictures but she’s also just getting older. She still looks great. I’ve been out and about all day and haven’t seen one woman her age who looks as good as her.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  07:45 PM

Damn Cindy, slap on some makeup, your a supermodel, geez!!!

Posted by porsche_byatch  on  05/07  at  07:59 PM

From the looks of that one droopy eye..it looks like she had a stroke.

Posted by Shitney Beers  on  05/07  at  08:34 PM

people, people, even though this is a really bad pic of her and we are used to her looking totally fab and glam, she still is NO TERI Hatcher OK? And she is still an actual supermodel unlike some bitches they are calling supermodels who are bland at best. Cindy probably had some botox or had her brows overly arched to appear younger but it made her look ick instead.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  08:38 PM

It looks like she’s had some things done to her face.She’s a beautiful women.It looks like botox to me ora brow lift,but that’s just me.LOL

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  09:40 PM

Does anyone else think it’s cheating when both current & post supermodels get plastic surgery? confused

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/07  at  11:13 PM

I’m leaning towards a couple of drinks and bad photo, but still looking good.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  04:47 AM

cool smirk  Nice to see nature is catching up with her. Not so good looking without make up!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  04:47 AM

I would have more sympathy for her if she was a non-celebrity mother of twins in her 40s. She’s made her billions from being a SUPERmodel. She’s also done some recent modeling work too. Just because you’re a model doesn’t necessarily mean you’re beautiful. Models are hired because of their ability to be a chamelion, or have a little acting ability in front of the camera. Notice I said “a little acting ability” ‘cause we all know that’s all Cindy’s got. Models are also hired because of their height. That’s basically the 2 reasons models get work. Believe it or not, beauty is becoming less and less of a reason. They know they can doctor up a photo and a face. It’s all smoke and mirrors. I’m glad to see Cindy like this. It proves my point.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  04:49 AM

As a matter of fact, she looks a little like Fire Marshal Bill.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  07:50 AM

She’s still beautiful and her kids are gorgeous.  I’d rather look like her than most of the other woman posted on this site.

Posted by myopinionisplatinum  on  05/08  at  07:53 AM

Shes totally BOTOXED out! She looks HARD as nails!
ICK…Im disguested…if she just let herself age gracefully - she would be fine….She looks pulled and disgusting.

Doesnt she sell soem anti=aging lotion or something?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  07:55 AM

She is beautiful, bad pics is all this is.  She is so much nicer to look at than Kate Moss.  Cindy is from the day when models had to be gorgeous and tall.  Not like now when they get scrawny crack-whores to do the adverts for major labels.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  10:29 AM

I agree gossipmom. This shows you at no one is perfect and make up works wonders!!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/08  at  07:13 PM

In response to Beautiful IQ: No, I don’t think it is “cheating” when post and present supermodels have work done.  Most of them have had work done (Giselle’s nose and boobs, Adriana Lima’s upper lip and boobs, Naomi Campbell’s nose, etc.), but I do think it is called *** LYING *** when you swear up and down that you have never had * anything * done to your face in order to SELL your skin care line (Cindy Crawford sells “Meaningful Beauty”) when it looks like you have totally altered the area around your eyes and brows. Just my two cents…