Cindy Crawford Dissed by PETA
Wednesday, October 31, 2007 • (8) Comments • Tags: Celebrity ,Cindy Crawford ,Magazines ,Models

Cindy Crawford has angered PETA by appearing on the cover of Russian Vogue
wearing a fur coat.

The 41-year-old model - who infuriated the animal rights group in 2004 when
she agreed to be a spokesperson for their anti-fur campaign before modeling
for exclusive mink clothing range Blackglama - has sparked further
controversy by gracing the cover of the well-respected fashion magazine
sporting fur.

One livid PETA member said: "What a wretched and sad excuse for a human
being. I think she's an ugly person and a washed-up, withered, mole-faced
hag whose career was over 10 years ago
.

"Go away Cindy, no one cares about you anymore. People who wear fur are just
disgusting and vile."

Another added: "With that big furry mole on her face, you'd think she'd be
more sensitive to the plight of animals. The lives of the animals she wears
are like her relationships - short and painful."

PETA are no strangers to causing controversy.

Alicia Silverstone recently caused a stir when she posed naked to promote
vegetarianism as part of PETA's goveg.com campaign.

image

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  10/31  at  08:42 AM

PETA is a bunch of stupid mother f***ers! 


Is that really the way to get your message across?  They are bunch of dictators!  Dont try to push your crap down peoples’ throats!

We are living in an insensitive, materialistic, superficial wolrd, but is that the way to get people to see your point of view? 

Way to go PETA!  We see your sensitivity! 

I’m sure there’s a better way PETA could have gone about this situation!  MORONS!

Posted by AgentHollywood  on  10/31  at  09:24 AM

And calling people washed up hags and pointing out the fact that she has a mole on her face is making them any better? I would say that they are no better than the people who wear fur since they show no sensitivity to people just because they don’t agree with them. What is the point of peta really? To get pissed at everybody who touches the fur or skin of a dead animal, get real.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  10/31  at  11:45 AM

They are mad because Cindy did an anti-fur campaign for them.  So basically she is a hypocrite.

By the way, there are animals near extinction because of the fur trade. So I am going to have to side with Peta.

Posted by CoLoStOmY bAg  on  10/31  at  12:51 PM

go peta!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  10/31  at  04:04 PM

Cindy deserves it. It’s true People who wear fur should be skinned alive just to see how it was for the animals going through that just so she could wear an ugly ass TACKY coat.

Posted by Mix  on  11/01  at  01:45 AM

I dislike Peta but I hate the fur industry more.

A note to those saying Peta shoves their beliefs down people’s throats - Peta has said in the past that they say and do the outrageous things because it is the only way people pay attention. Their donations increase when they cause a stir and those donations go to programs less media glamorous than “sexiest vegetarian.”

I don’t know how to feel about it, personally, other than the fur industry is just plain wrong.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  11/04  at  01:42 AM

Is it just me or are PETA’s tactics undeniably and eerily similar to those of the CoS? (Church of Scientology) Both PETA and the CoS seem like cults who “employ” celebrities to further their respective nutso crusades, and turn on those celebrities (and other “members) who actively speak out or go against their mandates. Both use intimidation, public humiliation and intrusionary/exclusionary tactics while maintaining an all-or-nothing stance on their ideals. If you step even a millimeter over these psychos’ imaginary line of “morality” you’re, in L. Ron Hubbard’s famous directive, fair game.

I agree animals should not be used in the clothing industry, but PETA goes too far and are, in fact, alienating people from the basic message. When you associate childish name-calling and truly psychotic demonstrations with such a serious cause, you do nothing but detract from the original message.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  01/03  at  02:57 PM

PETA DO WHATEVER IT TAKES…PEOPLE WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND OR EVEN TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE ANIMALS ARE GOING THRU FOR ONE BITCH WHO IS SO DUMB THAT SHE UNABLE TO SEE ANYTHING MORE THAN HER BIG ASS.

TAKE RESPONsibility for your choices CINDY !!!

And you people, who are so AGAINST PETA look at your dog or cat if you have any and think, that they also could be a furrrrrr - in ASIA THEY MAKE FURS FROM CATS AND DOGS JUST AS THEY MAKE IT FROM OTHER ANIMALS….

THINK PEOPLE - THEY ALL FEEL PAIN JUST THE WAY WE FEEL IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


(sorry for mistakes, i’m not fluent in english)